Appendix B: Management and accountability statistics
Appendix B: Management and accountability statistics
Staffing
Table B.1 Employees by classification and location at 30 June 2020
Classification | Adelaide | Brisbane | Cairns | Canberra | Darwin | Melbourne | Perth | Sydney | Tamworth | Total |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Aerodrome Inspector | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Airworthiness Inspector | 4 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 51 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Aviation Safety Advisor | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Other | 2 | 39 | 1 | 56 | 1 | 15 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 130 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Safety Systems Inspector | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 12 |
Certificate Team Managera | 2 | 9 | 2 | 13 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 46 |
Flight Training Examiner | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 11 | |
Flying Operations Inspector | 4 | 20 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 12 | 2 | 68 |
National Office Manager | 0 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
Other classifications | 3 | 81 | 7 | 325 | 1 | 13 | 6 | 12 | 1 | 449 |
Professional Services | 1 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 16 |
Senior Management | 0 | 3 | 1 | 27 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 35 |
Total | 19 | 175 | 24 | 455 | 8 | 72 | 38 | 59 | 7 | 857 |
a This classification replaced the Certificate Management Team Leader classification reported in 2018–19.
Table B.2 Employees by classification and location at 30 June 2019
Classification | Adelaide | Brisbane | Cairns | Canberra | Darwin | Melbourne | Perth | Sydney | Tamworth | Total |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Aerodrome Inspector | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Airworthiness Inspector | 2 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 7 | 14 | 2 | 59 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Aviation Safety Advisor | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Other | 3 | 40 | 1 | 52 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 124 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Safety Systems Inspector | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 15 |
Certificate Management | 3 | 10 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 42 |
Flight Training Examiner | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 10 |
Flying Operations Inspector | 5 | 20 | 7 | 5 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 13 | 2 | 71 |
National Office Manager | 0 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 |
Other classifications | 3 | 80 | 6 | 329 | 2 | 14 | 5 | 14 | 2 | 455 |
Professional Services | 1 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
Senior Management | 0 | 3 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 34 |
Total | 20 | 177 | 25 | 449 | 10 | 71 | 34 | 66 | 7 | 859 |
Table B.3 Ongoing and non-ongoing employees by classification and gender at 30 June 2020
Classification | Female | Male | Total | ||||
Casual | Ongoing | Non-ongoing | Casual | Ongoing | Non-ongoing | ||
Aviation Safety Regulator – Aerodrome Inspector | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Airworthiness Inspector | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51 | 0 | 0 | 51 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Aviation Safety Advisor | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Other | 17 | 1 | 0 | 105 | 5 | 2 | 130 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Safety Systems Inspector | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
Certificate Team Managera | 6 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 46 |
Flight Training Examiner | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
Flying Operations Inspector | 4 | 0 | 0 | 62 | 2 | 0 | 68 |
National Office Manager | 3 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
Other classifications | 240 | 18 | 4 | 172 | 15 | 0 | 449 |
Professional Services | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 16 |
Senior Management | 6 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 3 | 0 | 35 |
Total | 284 | 22 | 6 | 514 | 29 | 2 | 857 |
a This classification replaced the Certificate Management Team Leader classification reported in 2018–19.
Table B.4 Ongoing and non-ongoing employees by classification and gender at 30 June 2019
Classification | Female | Male | Total | ||||
Casual | Ongoing | Non-ongoing | Casual | Ongoing | Non-ongoing | ||
Aviation Safety Regulator – Aerodrome Inspector | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 9 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Airworthiness Inspector | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59 | 0 | 59 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Aviation Safety Advisor | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Other | 0 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 104 | 7 | 124 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – Safety Systems Inspector | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 15 |
Certificate Management Team Leader | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 0 | 42 |
Flight Training Examiner | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 10 |
Flying Operations Inspector | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 1 | 71 |
National Office Manager | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 19 |
Other classifications | 7 | 237 | 25 | 1 | 166 | 19 | 455 |
Professional Services | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 13 |
Senior Management | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 25 | 2 | 34 |
Total | 9 | 273 | 28 | 2 | 517 | 30 | 859 |
Table B.5 Employees by classification and full-time/part-time at 30 June 2020
Classification | Full-time | Part-time | Total | |||
Ongoing | Non-ongoing | Ongoing | Non-ongoing | Casual | ||
Aviation Safety Regulator – | 8 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – | 51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – | 118 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 130 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
Certificate Team Managera | 46 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46 |
Flight Training Examiner | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
Flying Operations Inspector | 61 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 68 |
National Office Manager | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
Other classifications | 373 | 29 | 39 | 4 | 4 | 449 |
Professional Services | 10 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 16 |
Senior Management | 31 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
Total | 748 | 45 | 50 | 6 | 8 | 857 |
a This classification replaced the Certificate Management Team Leader classification reported in 2018–19.
Table B.6 Employees by classification and full-time/part-time at 30 June 2019
Classification | Full-time | Part-time | Total | |||
Ongoing | Non-ongoing | Ongoing | Non-ongoing | Casual | ||
Aviation Safety Regulator – | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – | 59 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 59 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – | 111 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 124 |
Aviation Safety Regulator – | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
Certificate Management Team Leader | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42 |
Flight Training Examiner | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
Flying Operations Inspector | 66 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 71 |
National Office Manager | 18 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 |
Other classifications | 359 | 41 | 44 | 3 | 8 | 455 |
Professional Services | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 13 |
Senior Management | 30 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 34 |
Total | 733 | 52 | 57 | 6 | 11 | 859 |
Executive remuneration
Table B.7 Remuneration paid to key management personnel, 2019–20
Short-term | Post-employment benefits | Other | Termination benefits ($)b | Total remuneration ($) | ||||||
Name | Position title | Base salary ($)a | Bonuses ($)b | Other benefits and allowances ($)c | Superannuation contributions ($)d | Long service leave accrued ($)e | Other long-term benefits ($)b | |||
Carmody, Shane | Chief Executive Officer & Director of Aviation Safety | 546,391 | 0 | 42,361 | 82,033 | 13,706 | 0 | 0 | 684,491 | |
Crawford, Graeme | Group Executive Manager Aviation Group | 408,415 | 0 | 31,258 | 61,830 | 10,114 | 0 | 0 | 511,617 | |
Walker, Robert | Executive Manager Stakeholder Engagement | 307,240 | 0 | 24,009 | 44,124 | 7,768 | 0 | 0 | 383,140 | |
Aleck, Jonathan | Executive Manager | 439,310f | 0 | 25,802 | 12,256 | 8,232 | 0 | 0 | 485,600 | |
Crome, Philippa | Executive Manager Corporate Services | 323,398 | 0 | 24,009 | 57,107 | 7,768 | 0 | 0 | 412,282 | |
Frawley, Simon | Chief Financial Officer | 232,642 | 0 | 18,173 | 43,650 | 5,880 | 0 | 0 | 300,345 | |
Mathews, Anthony | CASA Board member (Chair) | 118,781 | 0 | 2,176 | 18,292 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 139,250 | |
Bridge, Michael | CASA Board member | 59,391 | 0 | 670 | 9,146 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 69,207 | |
Cartwright, Cheryl | CASA Board member | 48,196 | 0 | 138 | 7,422 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 55,756 | |
McAloon, Jane | CASA Board member | 30,605 | 0 | 8,586 | 6,273 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45,463 | |
Rindfleish, Mark | CASA Board member | 59,391 | 0 | 1,470 | 9,146 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 70,007 | |
Taylor, Anita | CASA Board member | 40,657 | 0 | 7,050 | 7,119 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54,826 | |
Hardman, Donna | CASA Board member | 28,786 | 0 | 8,212 | 5,647 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42,645 | |
Total | 2,643,202 | 0 | 193,913 | 364,046 | 53,467 | 0 | 0 | 3,254,629 |
Note: CASA’s key management personnel are those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the activities of CASA, directly or indirectly. Each dollar amount is based on an individual’s remuneration rounded to the nearest dollar. The remuneration of this cohort is determined under CASA Directive – Senior Managers and Medical Officers Remuneration 2019 and approved by the Director of Aviation Safety. This is reviewed annually against the Australian Public Service (APS) remuneration to ensure appropriate parity against the APS is maintained. Currently, all salary points are below the median rates identified in the 2018 survey. Individual remuneration for key management personnel is determined within the salary scales dependent on their experience and may progress through the identified increment point based on their performance during the previous year. The Director of Aviation Safety and Board members remuneration are determined by the Remuneration Tribunal.
a Includes gross payments (less any bonuses paid).
b No payments were made in this category in 2019–20.
c Includes annual leave accrued during the reporting period and any allowances that are reportable on individual payment summaries.
d Employer superannuation contributions.
e Long service leave accrued during the reporting period.
f Base salary figure includes a lump sum payment for the cash out of 90 days of accrued excess annual leave.
Table B.8 Remuneration paid to senior managers, 2019–20
Short-term benefits | Post-employment benefits | Other long-term benefits | Termination benefits | Total remuneration | |||||
Total remuneration band ($) | No. of staff | Average base salary ($)a | Average bonuses ($)b | Average other benefits and allowances ($)c | Average superannuation contributions ($)d | Average long service leave accrued ($)e | Average other long-term benefits ($)b | Average termination benefits ($)b | Average total remuneration ($) |
0–220,000 | 4 | 125,898 | 0 | 7,463 | 9,904 | 2,358 | 0 | 0 | 182,832 |
220,001–245,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
245,001–270,000 | 2 | 202,910 | 0 | 15,727 | 33,526 | 5,088 | 0 | 0 | 257,251 |
270,001–295,000 | 12 | 222,234 | 0 | 20,388 | 35,300 | 5,510 | 0 | 0 | 283,433 |
295,001–320,000 | 8 | 232,991 | 0 | 19,616 | 43,360 | 5,880 | 0 | 0 | 301,846 |
320,001–345,000 | 2 | 262,859 | 0 | 20,442 | 40,480 | 6,614 | 0 | 0 | 330,396 |
Average based | 28 | 213,067 | 0 | 17,992 | 34,218 | 5,214 | 0 | 0 | 270,491 |
Note: CASA’s senior managers are those employees who are substantively appointed to a senior management position or those employees who have acted as a senior manager for a minimum of three months during the reporting period. Managers who are also key management personnel are excluded.
Figures have been rounded to the nearest dollar.
Each row is an averaged figure based on headcount for individuals within the remuneration range.
a Includes gross payments (less any bonuses paid).
b No payments were made in this category in 2019–20.
c Includes annual leave accrued during the reporting period and any allowances that are reportable on individual payment summaries.
d Employer superannuation contributions.
e Long service leave accrued during the reporting period.
Table B.9 Remuneration paid to other highly paid employees, 2019–20
Short-term benefits | Post-employment benefits | Other long-term benefits | Termination benefits | Total remuneration | |||||
Total remuneration bands ($) | No. of staff | Average base salary ($)a | Average Bonuses ($)b | Average other benefits and allowances ($)c | Average superannuation contributions ($)d | Average long service leave accrued ($)e | Average other long-term benefits ($)b | Average termination benefits ($)f | Average total remuneration ($) |
220,001–245,000 | 18 | 171,719 | 0 | 23,888 | 31,242 | 4,341 | 0 | 0 | 231,191 |
245,001–270,000 | 27 | 166,735 | 0 | 48,749 | 37,358 | 4,239 | 0 | 0 | 270,797 |
270,001–295,000 | 12 | 173,405 | 0 | 65,236 | 35,585 | 4,375 | 0 | 0 | 527,672 |
295,001–320,000 | 2 | 207,811 | 0 | 52,559 | 37,145 | 5,199 | 0 | 0 | 302,714 |
320,001–345,000 | 1 | 147,354 | 0 | 9,562 | 22,363 | 2,921 | 0 | 145,021 | 327,221 |
520,001–545,000 | 1 | 418,352 | 0 | 33,919 | 64,426 | 10,975 | 0 | 0 | 527,672 |
Average based | 61 | 174,672 | 0 | 43,896 | 35,396 | 4,416 | 0 | 145,021 | 260,757 |
Note: CASA’s highly paid employees are employees whose reportable remuneration was $225,000 or more for the reporting period, who are not appointed as a senior manager. Remuneration for highly paid employees may include remuneration for periods of acting as a senior manager that total less than three months during the reporting period.
Each row is an averaged figure based on headcount for individuals within the remuneration range.
a Includes gross payments (less any bonuses paid).
b No payments were made in this category in 2019–20.
c Includes annual leave accrued during the reporting period and any allowances that are reportable on individual payment summaries.
d Employer superannuation contributions.
e Long service leave accrued during the reporting period.
f Includes voluntary redundancy payments and payments in lieu of notice.
External scrutiny
Table B.10 Administrative Appeals Tribunal merits reviews of CASA regulatory decisions, 2017–18 to 2019–20
Matters | 2017–18 | 2018–19 | 2019–20 |
With the tribunal | |||
Applications on hand from the previous year | 14 | 15 | 12 |
Applications lodged during the year | 20 | 16 | 8 |
Total | 34 | 31 | 20 |
Dealt with | |||
Decisions affirmed | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Decisions varied | 2 | 7 | 0 |
Decisions set aside | 0 | 2 | 1 |
Matters dismissed | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Total | 8 | 13 | 6 |
Other | |||
Applications withdrawn by the applicant | 11 | 8 | 5 |
Applications remaining on hand at 30 June | 15 | 12a | 10 |
Total | 26 | 20a | 15 |
Note: A single application to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal often involves more than one reviewable decision. In such cases, a decision by the tribunal on a particular application may be composed of multiple decisions to affirm, set aside or vary decisions made by CASA. For that reason, some of the figures shown for matters dealt with reflect multiple outcomes arising out of a single application, and the figures shown for total applications dealt with do not reflect the total numbers of decisions affirmed, varied or set aside or matters dismissed.
a Correction of error in the 2018–19 annual report.
Table B.11 Categories of CASA decisions appealed to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal, 2019–20
Subject of decision | Refusal to issue | Issue subject to conditions not sought by applicant for the authorisation | Cancellation/ suspension | Variation/ imposition of conditions not sought by holder | Total |
Flight crew licence (including ratings and endorsements) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Aviation maintenance licence or authority (including ratings) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Medical certificate | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
Air operator certificate | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Certificate of approval | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Certificate of registration or airworthiness | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Chief pilot approval | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Maintenance controller approval | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Exemption | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Freedom of information | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Remote pilot licence | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other matters | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Total | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
Table B.12 Applications to the Federal Court for judicial review of CASA regulatory decisions, 2017–18 to 2019–20
Matters | 2017–18 | 2018–19 | 2019–20 | |||
Filed by subject person | Filed by CASA | Filed by subject person | Filed by CASA | Filed by subject person | Filed by CASA | |
With the court | ||||||
Applications on hand from the previous year | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Applications filed during the year | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Dealt with | ||||||
Applications granted | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Matters dismissed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Other | ||||||
Proceedings discontinued | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Applications on hand at 30 June | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Decisions arising from Administrative Appeals Tribunal decisions | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Table B.13 Coronial inquiries, 2017–18 to 2019–20
2017–18 | 2018–19 | 2019–20 | |
Inquiries on hand from previous year | 1 | 1 | 2 |
New inquiries | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Total | 2 | 3 | 2 |
Conclusions handed down | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Inquiries remaining in progress at 30 June | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Table B.14 CASA’s response to coronial recommendations, 2019–20
Inquest | Inquest into the Deaths of Kerri Pike, Peter Dawson and Tobias Turner – mid-air collision between single and tandem skydivers. |
State | QLD |
Date of findings | 30 August 2019 |
Recommendations for CASA
(1) CASA to consider including a regulation concerning equipment compatibility, in particular main parachute and container compatibility.
(2) CASA to consider recommending to the Australian Skydiving Association the implementation of six monthly equipment check and a day to day buddy checking system, as proposed to the APF above.
Response from CASA
Recommendation (1)
On 16 December 2019, the Civil Aviation Legislation Amendment (Parts 103, 105 and 131) Regulations 2019 were registered on the Federal Register of Legislation and included the provisions of Part 105 of the Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (Cth) (CASR). CASA considers that Part 105 of the CASR contains the required head of power to address recommendation a). Part 105 of CASR is due to commence in December 2021.
Regulation 105.010 of the CASR defines a major defect in a reserve parachute as something that may affect the safe operation of the parachute assembly or cause the parachute assembly to become a danger to persons or property. Regulation 105.055 of the CASR provides requirements (including offence provisions) if a person undertakes a parachute descent without a reserve parachute assembly that meets the equipment requirements specified in the Part 105 Manual of Standards, or is provided with a reserve parachute that does not meet those requirements. The Part 105 Manual of Standards is a legislative instrument that prescribes additional matters for the purposes stated in Part 105 of the CASR.
Regulation 105.060 provides that a reserve parachute is also deemed to be a defective parachute if it is subject to a report under regulations 105.045 or 105.050; it is subject to an airworthiness directive; the parachute assembly does not meet the equipment requirements of regulation 103.055 as specified in the Manual of Standards; or, the manufacturer has issued a notice stating safety action must be taken in relation to the parachute.
The definitions of reserve parachute and reserve parachute assembly will be prescribed in the Part 105 Manual of Standards.
As noted previously, regulation 105.055 requires that the reserve parachute assembly must meet and be maintained in accordance to the requirements as prescribed in the Part 105 Manual of Standards. The relevant text of the provision is as follows:
(3) The requirements are as follows:
(a) the reserve parachute assembly must meet the requirements prescribed by the Part 105 Manual of Standards;
(b) the reserve parachute assembly must have been maintained in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Part 105 Manual of Standards.
The term reserve parachute assembly will also be defined in the Part 105 Manual of Standards and will prescribe all the components that make up the assembly, and likely include the container itself.
The Part 105 Manual of Standards is currently undergoing development by CASA and is expected to be completed by the end of 2020. The commencement of Part 105 (Regulation and Manual of Standards) is set for December 2021. It is CASA’s intention to ensure that the Manual of Standards prescribes requirements for ensuring that the ‘airworthiness’ of parachute equipment is comprehensively established and maintained.
CASA considers that the equipment standard in use by the peak Australian Parachuting body, the Australian Parachuting Federation (APF) should form the basis for the parachuting standard utilised within the Part 105 Manual of Standards, although CASA will also take into account the standards prescribed by other international aviation safety regulators.
The APF reissued its equipment standard in June 2019 (copy attached) in relation to component compatibility. It is anticipated that this will be updated again following acceptance of the latest proposed update of the APF Operational Regulations received by CASA in February 2020 to take into account the changes to the compatibility check requirements.
As part of the proposed update to the APF’s Operational Regulations currently under consideration, the following amended provisions (emphasis added) have been advised by the APF to CASA. It is expected that similar provisions will be adopted under the Part 105 Manual of Standards in due course:
6.1.11 Individual Responsibilities
A parachutist must:
(a) not contravene any provision of these regulations;
(b) not refuse or neglect to comply or be reckless as to whether or not they comply with these regulations or the Constitution or any other regulations;
(c) not act in a manner dangerous to themselves or others during the course of parachuting activities;
(d) ensure their equipment complies with Part Seven of these regulations;
(e) ensure their equipment is checked by another APF member (“buddy check”) before emplaning;
(f) comply with all pre-jump briefings;
(g) be assured of their position in relation to the target prior to exit; and
(h) report all incidents to the DZSO.
7.1.1 Harness and Parachutes (2020 Proposed Change to Op Reg)
(i) A parachutist must wear a harness and container system that complies with APF Equipment Standards and the TOM and which has at least two ram-air parachutes, one of which must be a reserve parachute.
(j) The main parachute must be verified as compatible with the rest of the parachute system by a Packer A or Rigger.
(k) The DZSO is responsible to ensure that:
(i) verification of compatibility is confirmed,
(ii) sport jumper equipment is inspected by an Instructor or Packer A for serviceability and compatibility every 12 months; and
(iii) records of inspections kept.
(l) An STO may approve equipment with a round parachute(s) for use, excluding displays, by the holder of a Certificate Class D or above, subject to conditions.
It is also noted that Part 105 of the CASR contains criminal offence provisions for the unauthorised conduct of parachuting activities and imposes additional obligations upon parachuting operators to ensure compliance with the obligations (including in relation to equipment) which are proscribed under that Part. For example, regulation 105.070 of the CASR provides as follows:
105.070 Additional obligations applying to parachute operators
(1) A parachute operator must take reasonable steps to ensure that each person employed or otherwise engaged by the operator to provide services or equipment for undertaking parachute descents:
(a) is aware of the obligations imposed on persons under this Part; and
(b) complies with any written procedures of the operator relating to the safe provision of those services or that equipment.
(2) A parachute operator must take reasonable steps to ensure that a person to whom the operator provides services or equipment for undertaking parachute descents:
(a) is aware of the obligations imposed on the person under this Part; and
(b) complies with any written procedures of the operator relating to the safe conduct of parachute descents.
(3) A person commits an offence if the person contravenes subregulation (1) or (2)
Penalty: 50 penalty units.
Recommendation (2)
As noted above, CASA has recently (February 2020) received for consideration and approval a proposed update to the APF Operational Regulations and this is presently under review.
The APF has presented CASA with the required updates, consistent with the Coroner’s recommendations, to require mandatory six-monthly (Novice) and 12-monthly (B certificate and above) equipment checks to be undertaken by a Packer A. Also contained within the proposed update to the Operational Regulations is the requirement for mandatory ‘buddy checks’ of equipment prior to emplaning (as extracted above).
Noting the proposed updated Operational Regulations also contain additional proposed changes not associated with the Coroner’s recommendations, it may be the case that the proposed Operational Regulations may not be approved in their totality, however, it is anticipated that the provisions extracted above will be accepted.
In relation to the obligation of the APF to ensure effective implementation of obligations such as the proposed six-monthly equipment check and day to day ‘buddy checking’ system, CASA is presently reviewing the Part 149 Manual of Standards which relates to the obligations of self-administering sport aviation bodies such as the APF. In conducting that review, CASA will be mindful of the coroner’s recommendation.
In discussions between CASA and the Australian Skydiving Association (ASA) it has been confirmed that the ASA will consider the recommendations that were made relating to day-to-day buddy checks and specific six-monthly equipment checks to mirror those contained in the APF’s currently proposed update. The usual practice has been for the ASA to commence updating of their Operational Regulations following CASA’s approval of any significant safety-based updates of the APF Operational Regulations. A current timeline for this process has not yet been determined, however, CASA will maintain contact with ASA on this point.
Inquest | Inquest into the deaths arising from the March 2014 plane crash at Caboolture Airfield – death of pilot and four skydivers in crash of Cessna 206 aircraft shortly after take-off. |
State | QLD |
Date of findings | 10 March 2020 |
Recommendations for CASA
(A) I recommend a thorough review of the requirements of the CASA-approved APF Jump Pilot Manual, and its suitability for providing appropriate risk-based standards for all air operations by APF club members.
(B) I recommend that CASA and the APF review the implications for public safety of low-time or part-time jump pilots flying sorties in aircraft owned by APF club members and organisations not controlled by persons with the background and experience of an AOC operator. Issues that should receive particular attention include:
(i) the level of training that jump pilots should be receiving and the introduction of specified and appropriately rigorous standards that would apply to jump pilots conducting flights transporting tandem parachutists to the point of departure from the aircraft;
(ii) the need for more regular proficiency checks of jump pilots with a qualified examiner, in accordance with a checking syllabus approved by CASA where the syllabus would focus on matters germane to the airlift component of flights carrying tandem parachutists;
(iii) the creation of a new operational rating or endorsement with special attention to moulding or expanding the application of the general competency rule contained in regulation 61.385 of the CASR to jump pilots to ensure a far higher standard of airmanship by jump pilots than is presently required; and
(iv) surveillance of the ‘airlift component’ of parachuting operations by CASA flying operations inspectors on a regular or systematic basis accompanied, where resources permit, by area safety officers of the APF.
Response from CASA
CASA is still considering its response to these recommendations.
Enforcement
Table B.15 Medical certificate cancellations and suspensions, 2017–18 to 2019–20
Certificate | 2017–18 | 2018–19 | 2019–20 | |||
C | S | C | S | C | S | |
Class 1 | 37 | 33 | 19 | 42 | 18 | 31 |
Class 2 | 42 | 28 | 11 | 37 | 21 | 39 |
Basic Class 2a | n/a | n/a | 4 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
Class 3 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 4 |
Total | 82 | 65 | 43 | 84 | 55 | 74 |
C = cancelled, n/a = not applicable, S = suspended
Note: The certificate classes are 1 Professional pilots and flight engineers, 2 Student and private pilots (Basic Class 2 is an alternative to a full Class 2 certificate for private operations), and 3 Air traffic control and flight service providers. A certificate issued may have more than one class of medical: for example, all Class 1 medicals are automatically issued a Class 2 medical. The total shown is the total number of certificates issued, not the sum of the three licence classes for initial issues or renewals.
a The Basic Class 2 medical certificate was introduced as part of changes made to the aviation medical certification system on 2 July 2018. The Basic Class 2 certificate allows designated aviation medical examiners and general practitioners to assess applicants against the Austroads commercial driving standards for some simple types of private flying.
Table B.16 Licence and certificate actions, 2017–18 to 2019–20
Action | 2017–18 | 2018–19 | 2019–20 |
Show cause notices issued | 42 | 28 | 12 |
Variations | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Suspensionsa | 16 | 5 | 3 |
Cancellations | 9 | 4 | 7 |
Note: These figures do not include action taken in relation to Civil Aviation Safety Regulations Part 99 offences in relation to medical certificates (see Table B.15) or variations processed by the CASA Service Centre.
a These include suspensions under regulations 265 and 269 of the Civil Aviation Regulations 1988.
Table B.17 Serious and imminent risk suspensions under section 30DC of the Civil Aviation Act 1988, 2017–18 to 2019–20
Action | 2017–18 | 2018–19 | 2019–20 |
Suspensions | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Table B.18 Aviation infringement notices and prosecutions, 2017–18 to
2019–20
Action | 2017–18 | 2018–19 | 2019–20 |
Infringement notices issued | 149 | 129 | 122a |
Matters referred to the Director of Public Prosecutions | 5 | 13 | 12 |
Prosecutions finalised | 6 | 7b | 13 |
Acquittals | 0 | 0 | 0c |
Convictions | 6 | 5 | 12 |
a Three infringement notices were withdrawn.
b Two matters resulted in findings of guilt with no conviction recorded.
c One prosecution was withdrawn by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions on public interest grounds.
Table B.19 Compliance-related actions, 2017–18 to 2019–20
Action | 2017–18 | 2018–19 | 2019–20 |
Enforceable voluntary undertakings | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Counselling | 106 | 105 | 97 |
Media, advertising and direct mail costs
Table B.20 Payments to media, advertising and direct mail organisations, 2019–20
Vendor | Amount ($) |
Media organisations | |
Australian Associated Press | 14,299 |
iSentia Pty Ltd | 51,171 |
Subtotal | 65,470 |
Advertising agencies | |
Universal McCann | 1,035,000 |
Subtotal | 1,035,000 |
Direct mail organisations | |
Australia Post | 140,511 |
Canon Business Services Australia | 25,544 |
Toll Transport | 67,998 |
Subtotal | 234,053 |
Total | 1,334,523 |
Note: In accordance with indexation as prescribed in the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918, only payments over $14,000 (inclusive of GST) are reported. Amounts exclude GST and are rounded to whole dollars.
Legal costs
Table B.21 Legal costs, 2019–20
Vendor | Amount ($) |
Australian Government Solicitor | 229,008 |
HWL Ebsworth | 48,047 |
Ian Harvey | 26,659 |
James Emmett | 19,574 |
MinterEllison | 136,018 |
Proximity | 40,172 |
Total | 499,478 |
Note: Relates to amounts over $14,000. Amounts exclude GST and are rounded to whole dollars.
Visit
https://www.transparency.gov.au/annual-reports/civil-aviation-safety-authority/reporting-year/2019-20-52